Saturday, October 13, 2007

Thoughts on Evil

As Halloween approaches, a philosopher's thoughts turn to evil. The "problem of evil" is one of the most widely discussed philosophical problems. It was a particular obsession of the great German philosopher and mathematician Leibniz. Lately, I've been thinking about Leibniz's work on this problem. Leibniz famously argued that the world is the best of all possible worlds that God could have created, a view that was later ridiculed by Voltaire in his book Candide. But it seems that even in Leibniz's day, several philosophers denied that there is a best of all possible worlds. Instead, they claimed that possible worlds are like numbers, and just as there is no greatest number, so too there is no greatest world.

But in that case what is God to do? Would He just arbitrarily pick a world, say world number 287,184, even though He could have just as easily created world number 287,185, which is greater! This would seem arbitrary and unbecoming of the all-powerful and all-good God. Surely God does not play dice! (Here I am assuming that there are as many possible worlds as real numbers and that the higher-numbered world is better than the lower one. For the sake of simplicity I am assuming that no two worlds are equally good, though, of course, this need not be the case.)

It seems that certain Jesuit theologians in Leibniz's time argued for God's arbirtary choice of this world. This would explain why this world contains so much evil. God had to pick some world to create, and whichever world He chose would be such that there are an infinite number of better worlds.

But it seems to me that if there is an infinite number of worlds God could have created, then there are two other options open to God other than arbitarily choosing one world. He could have chosen not to create any. Of course, He didn't do that. Or He could have created an infinite series of worlds that meet a minimum standard of goodness. Perhaps God created all the worlds in the open interval from 0 to infinity, that is, all the worlds that correspond to the positive real numbers. The negative worlds contain too much evil to be worthy of creation. Our world may be, say, in the neighborhood of 300,000 for all we know. (Some evidence points to our world being irrational, perhaps. [A joke]) In any event, not so great, but containing enough goodness to be creation-worthy.

The upshot of all this is that the significant amount of evil in this world is compatible with the existence of an omnipotent and perfect Being who did create the best worlds that can be created.

Or so I think. What do you think?

[An excellent article on Leibniz that I used in preparing this entry is at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-evil/. ]

3 comments:

Tricia said...

But what if creation is not separate from redemption? Can we have a God who creates with an eye for redemption, and he still be all good? I know this is dangerously close to saying "evil is good" but I'm not. What if redeeming evil, bringing good out of evil, is a necessary part of a good creation?

michael papazian said...

Yes, this is an important point and similiar to those presented by philosophers (John Hick, for example) who account for evil as a test or challenge that allows us to grow morally. It is true that most (if not all?) virtues depend on the existence of evil. How can courage exist without the reality of danger and harm?

That being said, this kind of defense still leaves unanswered the question of why God created such flawed and incomplete beings that need redemption. So I think one still has to consider the kind of argument I present to address this question.

Anonymous said...

From a physics analogy, we could assign matter as good, and antimatter as bad. For some unknown reason we live in a part of the universe that is entirely made of matter, even though both types should have been created in a 50/50 ratio. Now, if you combine matter with matter you get more matter, but if you mix matter with antimatter... poof.
Now, as for good and evil, God gave humans the ability to be like him, to choose good from evil. To make a world without evil would mean making autonomous humans; and so He gave us the decision to choose evil.
The choice to perform evil is ours, and the torment is not prescribed by God but rather by us. By our perspective God cold then only be evil by giving us that choice, but if He hadn't w would have no perspective of good and evil.